tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6395447442464891403.post8612449979584513153..comments2024-02-11T08:21:25.219+00:00Comments on FUZZY LOGIC: Holy Shitnaldohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17563789247589179756noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6395447442464891403.post-49337265023629035122008-12-23T17:37:00.000+00:002008-12-23T17:37:00.000+00:00Al, it's not often i go for laissez-faire, but i t...Al, it's not often i go for laissez-faire, but i think i concur with you on this one. Each to their own eh?naldohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17563789247589179756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6395447442464891403.post-24740149813912348222008-12-23T12:24:00.000+00:002008-12-23T12:24:00.000+00:00Gender Theory works as a model for examining a per...Gender Theory works as a model for examining a persons psychological gender, but one cannot discount the physiological differences between between males and females, including genetics and anatomy.<BR/>The question really surrounds the issue of whether there is a strict correlation between ones physiological and psychological genders. <BR/>While there may usually be a correlation, there is not always a correlation, so the answer must be no. <BR/>So the gender of the psyche then, is distinct from that of the physiology, being determined by social and cultural factors.<BR/>Where does this leave the issue of sexuality? <BR/>Again, sexuality is a cultural construct. Hetrosexual, homosexual and transexual are arbitrary terms used only to categorise. If one has separated the psychological and physiological gender, to which does one apply the sexuality?<BR/>Personally I would recommend a laissez-faire attititude to the whole subject. No need for labels, laws, rules and regulations. Certainly no need for doctrines passed down from the Vatican which the hard of thinking will treat as, er, gospel.Al Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00125000525699796748noreply@blogger.com